References on Evaluation of Citizen Engagement Initiatives

pic by photosteve101 on flickr

I have been doing some research on works related to the evaluation of citizen engagement initiatives (technology mediated or not).  This is far from exhaustive, but I thought it would be worth sharing with those who stop by here. Also, any help with identifying other relevant sources that I may be missing would be greatly appreciated.

10 thoughts on “References on Evaluation of Citizen Engagement Initiatives

  1. Thanks for sharing Tiago, much appreciated! I am too in the process of identifying literature evaluating citizen engagement and this list is very helpful. In case any other paper comes up during my research I will let you know.

  2. Another one may be Chess&Purcell, 1999, Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science & Technology 33(16): 2685

  3. Black, L., Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Stromer-Galley, J. (2010). Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation. In L. Holbert (ed.), Sourcebook of political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques (pp. 323-345). New York: Routledge.

    T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, M. Weiksner, & M. Leighninger (Eds.) (2012). Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Also, several methods of evaluation are explained and applied in: Carson, L., Gastil, J., Hartz-Karp, J., & Lubensky, R. (Eds.), The Australian Citizens’ Parliament and the future of deliberative democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  4. Thanks a lot Simon and Robert. I will go over them in the weekend and add them to the updated list.
    @Jorge: we are doing some work on this with other external partners and we should have something by the end of this year. Rest assured we will post about it here.

  5. Here my contribution:

    Bertot, John Carlo, Patrice McDermott, and Ted Smith. “Measurement of open government: Metrics and Process.” In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, pp. 2491-2499. IEEE, 2012.

    Chadwick, Andrew. “Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 8, no. 1 (2011): 21-40.

    Hevia, Felipe J., Vergara-Lope, Samana. “¿Cómo Medir la Participación? Creación, Validación y Aplicación del Cuestionario Conductas de Participación”. CIESAS. 2011.

    Lukensmeyer, Carolyn J., Joe Goldman, and David Stern. “Assessing public participation in an open government era.” IBM Center for the Business of Government (2011).

    Rosener, Judy B. “Citizen participation: can we measure its effectiveness?.” Public Administration Review (1978): 457-463.a

  6. I would offer a couple studies that the National Democratic Institute (NDI) has produced. The first is titled “Political-Process Monitoring: Considering the Outcomes and How they can be Measured” and it can be found here —
    The second is a forthcoming study simply titled “Citizen Participation and Technology” that will be available on the NDI website in e-book format later this week. Both are qualitative studies of NDI citizen participation programming that try to deepen our institutional understanding of what works and why.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s